Once again, the issue of road funding arises, with the Government recognising that even maintenance is massively underfunded, and the road lobby claiming that “road users pay for the roads many times over”.

The truth, of course, on both sides of the atlantic, is that this supposedly ‘private’ transportation is both provided and maintained at public expense, and that there is no sustained source of funding.  The road lobby always neglects 1) collateral expenses, such as policing, rescue and medical costs of road accidents, pollution, and carbon emission, and 2) the fact that it is perfectly legitimate for the State to raise taxes on what is largely a luxury (otherwise everyone would drive a Citroen 2CV, on those rare occasions they didn’t walk or cycle to work, like their grandparents did).

If something is given away free, at point of sale, then expect a queue.  The market is part of nature and cannot be denied.  Demand is regulated either through price or through queuing. With road use, relying on a queue (congestion) is both immensely costly – the one thing on which the CBI, the government and Friends of the Earth agree is the cost of congestion, in just lost production, at ~£100bn a year, and that was back in 1996 – and dramatically reduces the value of any road ;  who would pay the same for a ticket when journey time has doubled?

There will be no road pricing, since no politician has the balls to suggest it.  Congestion will double over the next twenty years, and the economy will suffer just as badly as people stuck in the jams.

Unlike the US, most of which has been built recently, the UK fortunately has the remains of a fabulous alternative transport system, built by our Victorian ancestors, who were just as great at investment as they were at engineering.  Demand for rail travel is rising exponentially.  Sadly, unlike the rest of Europe, we have added almost nothing, building only one new line in the last hundred years.  Even maintenance has been minimal, resulting in many deaths before it was reluctantly dealt with, but without adding significant capacity.

As oil prices rise, as they inexorably will, road transport, along with the stupid car-predicated sprawl that goes with it, will become increasingly uneconomic, leaving life for so many people impossible, and the economy dying of the equivalent of atherosclerosis – clogged arteries.

To quote Monty Python :  Let’s ‘ope there’s some intelligence somewhere up above, ‘cos there’s bugger all down ‘ere on Earth…

Snow and ice have descended on Britain for the second time this (2010/11) winter, and the entire transport network has again ground to a halt, except for the railway.

Anyone who has ever read the wonderful Thomas the Tank Engine stories, of the Rev. A. W. Audrey, will know that snow is no obstacle to a train.  Thomas himself only ever became stuck when he refused to wear his snowplough.  There is even less excuse for any modern train to fail in the face of foul weather, of any kind.  Points can be de-iced by electric heaters, and signals can operate by radio.  The only reason why the railway sometimes fails us these days is that drivers will often depend upon the road to get to their depot, because the railway itself now reaches only around half the country, after closure of around a third of the network and the rise of sprawl.

And yet the media, seeking sensation, give equal measure to the 10% failure of rail services as they do to the 90% failure of road transport.  As much time yesterday was devoted to the 20% reduction in international rail services (due to speed reductions) as to the 70% reduction in aviation.

Rail remains the mode of transport by far the most secure against foul weather.  Furthermore, rail is the only mode capable of mass evacuation in an emergency.  If New Orleans had seen the same investment in rail as it had in roads, far fewer people would have suffered and died.  The same high integrity and high capacity that makes this possible also allows movement of the very high numbers attending major cultural events.  The London 2012 Olympics can be served only by major rail investment, which thankfully is going ahead, despite the fact that Britain has been all but bankrupted by its banking industry.

I’m looking out at a road still only safely passable in a four-wheel-drive vehicle four days after a blizzard which deposited ten inches of snow over eight hours, and reduced visibility to a few metres.  All roads here became impassable with an hour, and yet every train ran through our village that day, and within minutes of schedule.

How can we have allowed our entire economy and lifestyle to become almost wholly dependent upon a mode of transport which becomes useless for a full week after a single storm and a temperature just two degrees below zero?

©2010 Ian East Open Channel Publishing Ltd. Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha